🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.