🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous online content suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and fit for minors," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the local level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are less and less content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.